Blog  |  Article

Tenant Screening Company Settles Lawsuit Over FCRA Violations

In early December, a California based company that provides tenant screening reports to property management companies agreed to pay $4.25 million as part of a…

In early December, a California based company that provides tenant screening reports to property management companies agreed to pay $4.25 million as part of a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Details About the Lawsuit

Clients sought litigation over claims that the agency failed to follow reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of reports on potential tenants. This is a direct violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). More specifically, the complaint filed on behalf of the FTC by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) claimed that the screening company failed to verify the accuracy of criminal and eviction records being received by a third-party vendor. Additionally, they included records that were more than 7 years old in their reports.

Under the FCRA, companies that provide background screening reports must implement proper procedures to ensure the “maximum possible accuracy” of information received from courts and research vendors. The FCRA prohibits the use of unverified information, is not pertinent to the report, or lies outside of the typical 7-year scope for searches.

Statement from the FTC

In a press release on the suit, Andrew Smith, the director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection provided commentary. He stated that, “consumers face enough hurdles in obtaining housing without the additional burden of inaccurate background checks.” Smith also emphasized the necessity of providing accurate information. “All background screening agencies must follow reasonable procedures to ensure that the background reports that they provide to their customers are as accurate as possible.”

The Importance of Proper Procedures

In this case, the importance of verifying information from research vendors is brought to light. Every record on a background screening must report an appropriate number of identifiers to constitute a match. Often, if researchers are unable to obtain information directly from a source, they rely on a third party to perform the research for them. Just as they would review records found through their own research, records received from vendors must also review using the same procedures.

Under this premise, it is safe to say that the most successful background screening companies utilize live researchers to ensure that they review every piece of information by a human eye. Not only does this protect the agency, but it protects denying consumers from certain opportunities based on inaccurate information.

Alliance 2020, Inc.
Corporate Headquarters
304 Main Ave S Suite 101
Renton WA 98057

Mailing: PO Box 4248
Renton WA 98057

425-271-8065
sales@alliance2020.com

You May Also Like…